| Chair: |
Katherine Ryan, University of Illinois at Urbana |
| Panelists: |
Voices in Conversation, Jennifer Greene, Cornell University |
| |
The Deliberative Democratic View, Ernest House & Ken Howe, University of Colorado
at Boulder |
| |
Pragmatism and Privilege: Means to an End?" Jean A. King, University of
Minnesota |
| Discussants: |
Katherine Ryan, University of Illinois at Urbana |
| |
Thomas Schwandt, Indiana University |
| Chair: |
Deborah Fournier, Boston University |
| Presenters: |
The Entity Called Program Evaluation: The Logic Based on Which Evaluators View
Evaluation as a Profession, Shahpar Modarresi, Diana L. Newman & Mitch Y. Abolafia,
State University of New York at Albany |
| |
Program Evaluation and the Theory of Organizational Effectiveness, Lawrence B. Mohr,
University of Michigan |
| |
Apprehending Connections: Naturalistic Generalization Versus Investigative Insight?,
Nick L. Smith, Syracuse University |
| Discussant: |
Abraham Wandersman, University of South Carolina |
| Chair: |
Patricia J. Rogers, Harvard University |
| Panelists: |
Using Program Theory Evaluation to Replicate Successful Programs, Timothy A. Hacsi,
Harvard University |
| |
Filling in the Black Box: A Shared Understanding Between Evaluators and Program Staff,
Tracy A. Huebner, Harvard University |
| |
How Theory-based Evaluation Can Help Research Synthesis: Exploiting Intermediate
Links, Anthony J. Petrosino, Harvard University |
| |
Answering Questions About Causal Attribution, Patricia J. Rogers, Harvard University |
| Discussant: |
Leonard Bickman, Vanderbilt University |
| Facilitator: |
David M. Chavis, Association for the Study and Development of Community |
| Participants: |
Linda Bowen, National Funding Collaborative on Violence Prevention |
| |
Julie Chambliss, EMSTAR Research, Inc. |
| |
Paul Florin, University of Rhode Island and Brown University |
| |
Cheryl N. Grills, Loyola Marymount University |
| |
Kien Lee, Association for the Study and Development of Community |
| Host: |
Daniel Matthews, University of Illinois at Springfield |
| Presenters: |
Exploring the Utility of Hall et al.'s Concerns-based Adoption Model for Evaluating
Educational Technology Development, Mark Hawkes, North Central Regional Educational
Laboratory |
| |
The Role of Evaluation in Becoming Better Distance Educators, Maria Hruby Moore &
Rosemary McMasters, The Ohio State University |
| |
Technology, Teaching, and Learning in Iowa High Schools, Nancy J. Maushak, Lynn
Manternach-Wigans & Caryl Bender, Iowa State University |
| |
Evaluation of Satellite-based Training for Teachers, Parents and Caregivers, Aimin
Wang, Christopher R. Wolfe & Doris M. Bergen, Miami University |
| Chair: |
Don Compton, American Cancer Society |
| Panelists: |
Don Compton, American Cancer Society (Framing the story) |
| |
Michael Quinn Patton, Utilization-focused Information and Training (Framing the story) |
| |
Michael Baizerman, University of Minnesota |
| |
Debbie Bonnet, D. Bonnet Associates |
| |
Robin Lackey, University of New Mexico |
| |
Hallie Preskill, University of New Mexico |
| Chair: |
Leslie J. Cooksy, University of Delaware |
| Presenters: |
Evaluators' Perspectives on Research Assumptions: Implications for Professional
Education and Practice, Kathleen A. Bolland, University of Alabama |
| |
Working Effectively With Program Stakeholders in Participatory Evaluation, Anna F.
Lobosco, NYS Developmental Disabilities Planning Council, Dianna L. Newman, State
University of New York at Albany |
| |
Fragmentation of Evaluation Practice and the Implications for Teaching Evaluation at
the University Level: What to Teach and Why, Rhonda Riherd Trautman, University of Arizona |
| Discussant: |
John Owens, University of Melbourne |
| Chair: |
Richard D. King, Jr., Vanderbilt University |
| Panelists: |
Using Risk & Protective Factors in Evaluating a Community's System of Social
Services, Teresa Carlo, Western Michigan University |
| |
Risk Factors & the Limits of Intervention for Marijuana Use, James H. Derzon,
Vanderbilt University |
| |
Risk & Protective Factor Assessment as a Tool for Case Management & Outcomes
Evaluation in Juvenile Justice Systems, Richard D. King, Jr., Vanderbilt University |
| |
Using Risk Factor Data to Guide Federal Youth Initiatives, Paul Kingery, George
Washington University |
| Chair: |
Jane Schleisman, University of Minnesota |
| Presenters: |
A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating Student-Related Outcomes of Tech-prep Programs:
A Mixed Method Approach, Steven R. Aragon, K. Peter Kuchinke & Debra Bragg, University
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign |
| |
A Mix Method Approach for Validating Nine Learning Style Instruments for Use with
Native American Adult Learners, Steven R. Aragon, University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign |
| |
The Role of Evaluation in Student Achievement of the National Science Education
Standard: Policy and Practice, Douglas Huffman, University of Minnesota |
| Chair: |
Stewart I. Donaldson, Claremont Graduate University |
| Presenters: |
Collaborative Development of a Theory-based Student Assessment for a Violence
Prevention Program, Norm Constantine & Kathleen Curry, WestEd |
| |
So What's the Final Verdict? Synthesizing Results From Theory-based Evaluations of
Multi-faceted Programs, E. Jane Davidson, Claremont Graduate University |
| |
Managing Evaluation Anxiety, Stewart I. Donaldson & Laura E. Gooler, Claremont
Graduate University |
| |
Leveling the Research Playing Field Between Consumer/Survivors and Mental Health
Researchers: The Coexistence of Weeds and Crops, Barbara Lee, Louis de la Parte Florida
Mental Health Institute; Dianne Cote, P.E.E.R. Center, Inc.; Sally Clay, Consumer
Advocate; and Frederick L. Newman, Florida International University |
| |
Let Us Open the Box! Transforming Society by Illuminating Program Process: Integration
of Local Program Theory and Interpretivism During Program Evaluation, Kathryn A.
Sielbeck-Bowen, Cornell University |
| Chair: |
Belle Brett, City Year, Inc. |
| Panelists: |
A Learning Organization's Relationship with Evaluation, Patti Bourexis, The Study
Group; and Joyce Kaser, Kaser and Associates |
| |
Building Skills, Creating Demand at the Grass Roots, Belle Brett, & Ivy Jones,
City Year |
| |
Evaluation Use at the National and Site Levels: Challenges and Successes, Stephanie Wu
& Lynnae Hill-Meade, City Year |
| |
Creating a Hunger for Data, Kristin Powell & Marc Hahn, Teachers' Academy for
Mathematics and Science |
| |
Developing the Core Competency of Reflective Practice, Joseph Frattaroli, Hosanna
Mahaley & Jeanne Brady, Teachers' Academy for Mathematics and Science |
| Discussant: |
Rosalie Torres, Developmental Studies Center |
| Chair: |
Elizabeth Holtzapple, Arizona Auditor General's Office |
| Presenters: |
Meeting the Challenges of Evaluating Private Versus Public Social Service Delivery,
Elham-Eid Alldredge, Margaret Marcus Hale, Zheng Wang, Suzanne Bowler & Samia Noursi,
REDA International, Inc. |
| |
Improving Private and Public Performance Measurement, Sharon Stout, Community Well
Research and Evaluation, Inc. |
| |
Cross-Agency Collaboration: Rhetoric or Reality?, Charles McClintock & Elizabeth
LaPolt, Cornell University |
| Discussant: |
Elizabeth Holtzapple, Arizona Auditor General's Office |
| Chair: |
John Hetherington, Southern Illinois University |
| Panelists: |
An Empirical Comparison of Item Response Theory and Classical Test Theory Statistics:
Show Me the Variance, John Hetherington & Denise M. Truskosky, Southern Illinois
University |
| |
Item Response Theory and Small Samples: Putting Parameter Invariance to the Test,
Denise M. Truskosky & John Hetherington, Southern Illinois University |
| |
The Environmental Test of Scientific Processes: An Application of Item Response Theory
in the Evaluation of Student Learning, Denise M. Truskosky & John Hetherington,
Southern Illinois University |
| |
Item Analysis of the Test of School Readiness: Benefits of the Classical and Item
Response Theory, Zarko Vukmirovic, Southern Illinois University |
| Discussant: |
Patrick McKnight, University of Arizona |
| Chair: |
Thomas E. Grayson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign |
| Presenters: |
Using a Bottom-up Approach To Identify Barriers and Issues Facing Individuals With
Disabilities in Educational Reform Initiatives, Thomas E. Grayson, University of Illinois
at Urbana-Champaign |
| |
Developing a Comprehensive Instrument for Facilitating Project Evaluation
Meta-Analysis and For Identifying Needs of Professional Development, Thomas Grayson &
Edith J. Cisneros-Cohernour, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign |
| |
Issues in Strategic Planning for Special Needs Populations, Gary W. Mauk, Eric J. Gee,
Spectrum Consulting |
| |
Understanding Evaluation Consent Disclosures: Improving the Informed Consent Process
When Evaluating Services for Persons With Severe Mental Illness, Paul G. Stiles &
Norman Poythress, University of South Florida |
| Chair: |
Michael Bamberger, World Bank |
| Presenters: |
Lessons Learned From a CECIP/UNICEF Evaluation of Educational Materials in Brazil,
Thomaz K. Chianca, Claudia P. Ceccon, Claudius Ceccon, Mário M. Chaves, Eduardo Marino
& Jovelina Protasio, Centro de Criação de Imagem Popular |
| |
A Life-of-Project (and Beyond) Perspective for Impact Evaluation: Some Learnings from
CARE's Experiences With International Development Projects, Jim Rugh, CARE |
| |
Building on Evaluation Results to Promote Effective Community Based Resources
Management Strategies in the Amazon, Laura E. Roper, Oxfam America |
| Chair: |
Eunice Rodriguez, Cornell University |
| Panelists: |
Cost Effectiveness of School-based Health Care, Robbya R. Green-Weir, Henry Ford
Health System |
| |
HIV Prevention Indicators: Monitoring HIV Prevention Vital Signs, Deborah L. Rugg,
Janet L. Heitgerd, David Cotton & Larry Wilkinson, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention |
| |
Evaluation and Epidemiology: Common Challenges and Converging Paths?, Eunice
Rodriguez, Cornell University |