Return to search form  

Session Title: Learning From the American Evaluation Association Topical Interest Groups Proposal Review Standards
Think Tank Session 307 to be held in Liberty Ballroom Section B on Thursday, November 8, 9:35 AM to 11:05 AM
Sponsored by the AEA Conference Committee
Presenter(s):
Daniela C Schroeter,  Western Michigan University,  daniela.schroeter@wmich.edu
Discussant(s):
Chris Coryn,  Western Michigan University,  christian.coryn@wmich.edu
Robert Hanson,  Health Canada,  robert_hanson@hc-sc.gc.ca
Ann Maxwell,  United States Department of Health and Human Services,  ann.maxwell@oig.hhs.gov
Martha Ann Carey,  Azusa Pacific University,  mcarey@apu.edu
Janice Noga,  Pathfinder Evaluation and Consulting,  jan.noga@stanfordalumni.org
Rita O'Sullivan,  University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill,  ritao@email.unc.edu
Elmima Johnson,  National Science Foundation,  ejohnson@nsf.gov
Emiel W Owens Jr,  Texas Southern University,  owensew@tsu.edu
Liesel Ritchie,  Western Michigan University,  liesel.ritchie@wmich.edu
Eunice Rodriguez,  Stanford University,  er23@stanford.edu
John Nash,  Open Eye Group,  john@openeyegroup.com
James Sass,  LA's BEST After School Enrichment Program,  jim.sass@lausd.net
Nino Saakashvili,  Horizonti Foundation,  nino.adm@horizonti.org
Ann Zukoski,  Oregon State University,  ann.zukoski@oregonstate.edu
Heather Boyd,  Virginia Tech,  hboyd@vt.edu
Susan Kistler,  American Evaluation Association,  susan@eval.org
Nicole Vicinanza,  American Evaluation Association,  nvicinanza@jbsinternational.com
Howard Mzumara,  Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis,  hmzumara@iupui.edu
Otto Gustafson,  Western Michigan University,  ottonuke@yahoo.com
Marcie Bober,  San Diego State University,  bober@mail.sdsu.edu
Tom McKlin,  Georgia Institute of Technology,  tom.mcklin@gatech.edu
Emmalou Norland,  Institute for Learning Innovation,  norland@ilinet.org
Neva Nahan,  Wayne State University,  n.nahan@wayne.edu
Denice Cassaro,  Cornell University,  dac11@cornell.edu
Eric Barela,  Los Angeles Unified School District,  eric.barela@lausd.net
Abstract: Annually, the American Evaluation Association (AEA) calls for submissions to present at its conference. In 2006 alone, more than 1,000 submissions were received and evaluated by AEA's Topical Interest Groups (TIGs). More than two thirds of all proposals submitted to AEA 2006 were reviewed by the TIGs involved in this session. Their review processes reflect on TIG evaluation practices, while posing important questions about standards the professional evaluation community applies to its conference submissions. Reflecting on experiences with reviewing AEA submissions, related challenges and opportunities, expectation of TIGs, and the current AEA program, this Think Tank asks: Do we hold proposals to the same or similar standards across all TIGs? Should we? Are our standards too high or too low? Should reviews be blinded, or not? How do we deal with tensions between inclusion and quality? Do submitters receive constructive feedback? How can reviews be conducted most efficiently?
Search Form