|
The Need for Evaluation Capacity Building in After-school Programs: Results From the Michigan Evaluation of 21st Century Community Learning Centers
|
| Presenter(s):
|
| Laurie Van Egeren,
Michigan State University,
vanegere@msu.edu
|
| Beth Prince,
Michigan State University,
princeem@msu.edu
|
| Megan Platte,
Michigan State University,
plattmet@msu.edu
|
| Celeste Sturdevant Reed,
Michigan State University,
csreed@msu.edu
|
| Laura Bates,
Michigan State University,
bateslau@msu.edu
|
| Abstract:
The Michigan 21st Century Community Learning Centers (21st CCLC) after-school program requires sites to both work with a local evaluator and participate in a state evaluation. However, sites' ability to collaborate with their local evaluators effectively varies, with implications for their potential to improve program quality. This paper uses the results of the Michigan 21st CCLC state evaluation of 36 grantees and 187 sites to examine: (a) characteristics of sites (e.g., type of organization, site size) and evaluators (e.g., internal or external) associated with differences in administrator attitudes toward evaluation and perceptions of how to use evaluation results; (b) relations between administrators' and staff attitudes about evaluation; and (c) administrators' perceptions of the utility of a standardized but individualized annual reporting process conducted by the state evaluators designed to build capacity for program improvement, particularly in sites who receive less benefit from working with a local evaluator.
|
|
Making Some Headway: An Internal Evaluation Branch's Efforts to Build Evaluation Capacity in an Urban School District
|
| Presenter(s):
|
| Eric Barela,
Los Angeles Unified School District,
eric.barela@lausd.net
|
| Abstract:
This paper is a chronicle of an internal evaluation branch's efforts to build internal evaluation capacity in a Southern California urban school district. Prior to 2007, internal evaluators within this school district did little to facilitate evaluation use because stakeholders were not held accountable for implementing findings. Due to personnel, policy, and operational changes at both the branch and district levels, decision makers began to pay more attention to internal evaluation findings and evaluators began to work with stakeholders to ensure that findings were used in appropriate ways. The branch- and district-level processes that led to the change were documented by a participant-observer using an embedded case study framework. The lessons learned from this ongoing process can be helpful for both decision makers trying to find the usefulness of evaluation findings and the internal evaluator trying to build evaluation capacity.
|
| |