|
Developing a Context for Program Evaluation: From Logic Models to Program Theory
|
| Presenter(s):
|
| Mary Elizabeth Arnold, Oregon State University, mary.arnold@oregonstate.edu
|
| Brooke J Dolenc, Oregon State University, dolencb@onid.orst.edu
|
| Abstract:
The purpose of program logic models is to articulate the connections between the resources that are invested in a program, what is done and who is reached with those resources, and what outcomes happen as a result. However, the connections between the elements of a logic model are often assumptive in nature. The assumptions about the links that describe how a program should work are crucial because the success of the program's effectiveness is dependent on their accuracy. In this paper, the authors will discuss the importance of developing logic models toward a more sophisticated and contextual understanding of a program's theory. Using the 4-H horse youth program as an example, the authors will share the process they used to develop a more contextual understanding of the program's theory and share how this enhanced knowledge of the theory shaped a large scale evaluation of the 4-H horse program.
|
|
Using Rigorous Program Evaluation Theory to Enhance Extension Program Planning
|
| Presenter(s):
|
| Alexa Lamm, University of Florida, alamm@ufl.edu
|
| Glenn Israel, University of Florida, gdisrael@ufl.edu
|
| Abstract:
This presentation explores the application of rigorous program evaluation theory and its affect on formative Extension program planning through a case study. Rigor is characteristic of evaluation quality and can be emphasized through the use of high quality evaluation tools. These tools include advanced impact models, process models, and logic models. Skilled evaluators are aware of the importance of rigor, but this is not always true of Extension professionals when creating program plans. These educators tend to jump into specific program planning unsure of how to include evaluation in the planning process (Arnold, 2002). This presentation discusses questions about how evaluation methods can strengthen program planning in the formative stage: What role do evaluators play while working with Extension program planning teams? How can programs be strengthened by including evaluation in the planning phase? The presentation provides recommendations regarding the use of rigorous evaluation methods while planning Extension programs.
|
|
The Influence of Program Theory on Evaluation Relevance, Quality and Impact in Extension's Florida Yards and Neighborhoods Program
|
| Presenter(s):
|
| Robert Strong, University of Florida, strong@ufl.edu
|
| Amy Harder, University of Florida, amharder@ufl.edu
|
| Abstract:
The relevance of this evaluation will describe the severity of problems, issues and concerns confronting the target audience of an adult Extension educational program in Florida. Educational solutions recommended focusing on the problems, concerns, and issues. The relevance of this evaluation will describe the personal and societal benefits from the implementation of recommended solutions. The quality of the evaluation will address specific aspects of the program. Additionally, the evaluation will describe the qualities of the program that are important to stakeholders. The evaluation will measure client and stakeholder satisfaction with those attributes. Lastly, impact measures the difference in the lives of individuals participating in the program. This is important to measure due to behavior change not occurring without knowledge gained in the first place. The change in learning (knowledge, attitudes, skills and aspirations) will be clarified. This presentation will explain the types of behavior change needed to attain the results.
|
| | |