Evaluation 2009 Banner

Return to search form  

Contact emails are provided for one-to-one contact only and may not be used for mass emailing or group solicitations.

Session Title: Informing School Boards and Education Policy Makers in Ways That Improve Educational Decision-making
Multipaper Session 351 to be held in Suwannee 11 on Thursday, Nov 12, 3:35 PM to 4:20 PM
Sponsored by the AEA Conference Committee
Chair(s):
Paul Rendulic,  PerforMetrics of Florida, rendulic@earthlink.net
A Template for Preparing a Meta-analysis of Evaluation Results: Informing School Board Members of the Impact of Grant Programs
Presenter(s):
Paul Rendulic, PerforMetrics of Florida, rendulic@earthlink.net
Abstract: Every year school districts compete for and receive federal and state funded grants. These grants usually require that an external evaluator conduct a third party evaluation of the funded program. Customarily the evaluator submits either formative and/or summative evaluation reports covering the status of the program implementation and the extent to which objectives have been attained. Unfortunately, this is where the dissemination of information usually ends; a filing cabinet full of evaluation reports. What about the ubiquitous impact of these grant programs across school district employees and students? To what extent are stakeholders informed of the overall impact that federal and state funded grants have on school district? This will not happen without a process to effectively summarize evaluation reports across multiple grants. This session presents a reporting template that when completed produces a user friendly, meta-analysis of annual evaluations.
Shift the Attention From Research Design to Research Use: What School Policy Makers Need to Know When Presented With Research?
Presenter(s):
Bo Yan, Blue Valley School District, byan@bluevalleyk12.org
Mike Slagle, Blue Valley School District, mslagle@bluevalleyk12.org
Abstract: As schools turn to data-driven decision making to improve student achievement, research is playing an increasingly important role in local policy making. Efforts have been made to help policy makers better understand research with a focus on research design and method. However, how to better use research has received little attention. This paper addresses this matter by discussing five issues concerning interpreting and applying research: 1) there is a difference between sample-based and population-based research; 2) statistical results are best guesses rather than decisive answers; 3) statistically significant results are not everything; 4) not all research results are applicable to local setting; and 5) research results are just one source of evidence. It is hoped that school administrators will have a new perspective when interpreting and applying research and feel empowered to ask more from researchers.

 Return to Evaluation 2009

Add to Custom Program