2010 Banner

Return to search form  

Contact emails are provided for one-to-one contact only and may not be used for mass emailing or group solicitations.

Session Title: Evaluation Challenges in Designing and Implementing a Program Evaluation: The Experience of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Colorectal Cancer Control Program and Prevention IS Care (PIC)
Multipaper Session 776 to be held in CROCKETT D on Saturday, Nov 13, 10:00 AM to 10:45 AM
Sponsored by the Government Evaluation TIG
Chair(s):
Amy DeGroff,  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, adegroff@cdc.gov
Planning an Impact Evaluation: The Experience of the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program
Presenter(s):
Amy DeGroff, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, adegroff@cdc.gov
Michelle Revels, ICF Macro International, michelle.l.revels@macrointernational.com
Danielle Beauchesne, ICF Macro International, danielle.a.beauchesn@macrointernational.com
Djenaba Joseph, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, dajoseph@cdc.gov
Anna Krivelyova, ICF Macro International, anna.krivelyova@macrointernational.com
Janet Royalty, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, jroyalty@cdc.gov
Florence Tangka, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ftangka@cdc.gov
Faye Wong, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, fwong@cdc.gov
Susan Zaro, ICF Macro International, susan.m.zaro@macrointernational.com
Abstract: This paper describes the evaluation planning process and resulting evaluation design for CDC’s Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP), a public health program aimed to increase population-level screening rates and, subsequently, to reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Planning efforts involved the development of a conceptual program framework, articulation of a program logic model, assessment of existing data sources, and extensive discussions among evaluators, survey researchers, epidemiologists, clinicians, and qualitative researchers. A theory-based evaluation has been designed to assess program implementation, outcomes, and impact. The design involves quasi-experimental approaches, including the use of matched comparison sites. The complexity of the CRCCP program (e.g., multiple intervention strategies that vary by grantee) challenged evaluators to construct a rigorous design that will allow assessment of program effectiveness. Evaluation methods will include periodic cross-sectional population and provider surveys, surveys of grantees, a longitudinal qualitative case study, and analysis of BRFSS, NPCR, and SEER data.

 Return to Evaluation 2010

Add to Custom Program