| In a 90 minute Roundtable session, the first
rotation uses the first 45 minutes and the second rotation uses the last 45 minutes.
|
| Roundtable Rotation I:
Engaging Social Justice in a Graduate Course on Program Evaluation |
|
Roundtable Presentation 213 to be held in GOLIAD on Thursday, Nov 11, 9:15 AM to 10:45 AM
|
|
Sponsored by the Teaching of Evaluation TIG
and the Multiethnic Issues in Evaluation TIG
|
| Presenter(s):
|
| Leanne Kallemeyn, Loyola University, Chicago, lkallemeyn@luc.edu
|
| Abstract:
The purpose of this roundtable will be to share how issues of social justice are intentionally woven into a graduate course on program evaluation. The substance of what is taught, as well as the pedagogy of how it is taught, will aim to expose students to social justice as it relates to evaluation practice. I will share a syllabus that incorporates readings from evaluation theorists who address social justice, as well as course assignments to engage these readings. I will also consider how a course project doing an evaluation may serve as an experiential component for learning about social justice and evaluation.
|
| Roundtable Rotation II:
Issues of Quality: Guiding Principles for Culturally Competent Teaching and Practice |
|
Roundtable Presentation 213 to be held in GOLIAD on Thursday, Nov 11, 9:15 AM to 10:45 AM
|
|
Sponsored by the Teaching of Evaluation TIG
and the Multiethnic Issues in Evaluation TIG
|
| Presenter(s):
|
| Arthur Hernandez, Texas A&M University, art.hernandez@tamucc.edu
|
| JoAnn Yuen, University of Hawaii, Manoa, joyuen@hawaii.edu
|
| Abstract:
This roundtable will provide an opportunity for individuals interested in promoting and teaching about cultural competence as part of a general preparation in evaluation methods to share philosophy, practices and challenges. The presenters will discuss evaluation theory and cultural competence from the perspective of teaching (Hernandez) and practice (Yuen) providing general guidelines and suggested practice from the perspective of successful and not-so-successful experience. Participants will discuss, elaborate and suggest related to their own interests and expertise and presenters will collect and organize the proceedings and email results to interested participants in an effort to facilitate self examination and further the development of evaluation skills related to teaching and practice for all involved.
|