| Session Title |
Room
|
|
What Constitutes Quality Evaluation of Development and Social Change: Values, Standards, Tradeoffs, and Consequences
|
Lone Star A
|
|
Implementation From the Ground Up: Defining, Promoting, and Sustaining Fidelity at All Levels of a State Program
|
Lone Star B
|
|
The Essential Features of Collaborative, Participatory, and Empowerment Evaluation
|
Lone Star C
|
|
Nonprofit Rating Systems and Implications for Evaluation
|
Lone Star D
|
|
Comparative Effectiveness Research in Program Evaluation
|
Lone Star E
|
|
Serving Two Masters: Local Evaluators Trying to Maintain Evaluation Quality and Use While Participating in a National Multi-site Evaluation
|
Lone Star F
|
Roundtable Rotation I: Truth, Beauty, And Justice For All: A Conversation With Graduate Students Examining Issues of Power, Control, and Evaluation Quality Within the Realm of Graduate Assistantships
Rountable Rotation II: The Role of Evaluation and Research Support in Ensuring Evaluation Quality
|
MISSION A
|
|
Evaluating the Intervention: A Look at Clinical Treatments and Client Implications
|
MISSION B
|
|
Using a Multi-stage, Mixed Methods Approach to Improve the Design of System Change Evaluations
|
BOWIE A
|
|
Third Annual Asa G. Hilliard III Think Tank on Culture and Evaluation
|
BOWIE B
|
|
Maintaining Quality in Challenging Contexts
|
BOWIE C
|
Roundtable Rotation I: Engaging Social Justice in a Graduate Course on Program Evaluation
Rountable Rotation II: Issues of Quality: Guiding Principles for Culturally Competent Teaching and Practice
|
GOLIAD
|
Roundtable Rotation I: Using Technology for Efficiency in Evaluation
Rountable Rotation II: Integrating Website Use Analytics into a Mixed Method Evaluation of a Professional Development Website
|
SAN JACINTO
|
|
Project Management Software: An Important Multi-Purpose Tool in an Evaluation Unit’s Toolbox
|
TRAVIS B
|
|
Assessing Evaluation Capacity: Using the Evaluation Capacity Diagnostic Tool
|
TRAVIS C
|
|
Improving Evaluation Quality Through and In the Arts
|
TRAVIS D
|
|
Mixed-Method Evaluation in Human Services Settings
|
INDEPENDENCE
|
|
Back to the Basics and Beyond
|
PRESIDIO A
|
|
The Power of Metaphor: Using Images for Organizational Analysis
|
PRESIDIO B
|
|
Evaluation of Youth Mental Health and Substance Abuse Interventions
|
PRESIDIO C
|
Roundtable Rotation I: Learning About Educational Reform From a Seven-Year Math-Science Partnership
Rountable Rotation II: When Quality and Policy Collide in Evaluating Math-Science Partnership Programs: Strategies for Resolution
|
BONHAM A
|
|
How Did You Do It? Implementing Performance Measurement and Monitoring Systems
|
BONHAM B
|
|
Evaluating K-8 Literacy Programs: Methods and Models
|
BONHAM C
|
|
Methods Leading to Higher Quality Evaluations in Education Evaluation
|
BONHAM D
|
|
Enhancing the Quality of Evaluation Through Collaboration Among Funders, Programs, and Evaluators: The Example of the New York City Health Bucks Program Evaluation
|
BONHAM E
|
|
Methodological Choices in Assessing the Quality and Strength of Evidence on Effectiveness
|
Texas A
|
|
Evaluating With Validity: Truth, Justice, and the Beautiful Way
|
Texas B
|
|
Dealing With Technical Challenges in Mixed Methods Evaluation
|
Texas C
|
|
Analysis and Evaluation of Research Portfolios Using Quantitative Science Metrics: Practice
|
Texas D
|
|
Why Evaluators Need Graphic Design Skills
|
Texas E
|
|
New Directions for Research on Evaluation
|
Texas F
|
|
Respecting and Protecting Boundaries: Social Evaluation Competencies
|
CROCKETT A
|
|
Evaluation Utilization and the Story of the Federal Railroad Administration’s 10 Year Research and Development Effort to Change Safety Culture in the United States Rail Industry
|
CROCKETT B
|
|
Assessing Impacts in Real World Evaluations: Alternatives to the Conventional Statistical Counterfactual
|
CROCKETT C
|
|
Evaluation and Quality: Examples From Government
|
CROCKETT D
|
|
Navigating the Intricacies of Culture and Context in International Program Evaluation
|
REPUBLIC A
|
|
Evaluating Health Program Sustainability: Improving the Quality of Methods and Measures
|
REPUBLIC B
|
|
Using a Practical Lens to Develop National-Level Participatory Projects
|
REPUBLIC C
|