|
Technology Supported Instruction: Best Practices for At-Risk and Underserved Learners
|
| Presenter(s):
|
| Kevin Murphy, University at Albany, SUNY, km989754@albany.edu
|
| Meghan Deyoe, University at Albany, SUNY, morris.mlm@gmail.com
|
| Kathy Gullie, University at Albany, SUNY, kp9854@albany.edu
|
| Dianna Newman, University at Albany, SUNY, dnewman@uamail.albany.edu
|
| Dean Spaulding, The College of Saint Rose, spauldid@strose.edu
|
| Victoria Coyle, University at Albany/SUNY,
|
| Holly Meredith, University at Albany/SUNY,
|
| Tim Julio McLaughlin, University at Albany/SUNY,
|
| Abstract:
This paper summarizes best practices in evaluation and programmatic findings identified via a cross site analysis of programs for multiple levels of learners supported by the use of technology. Programs reviewed included adult ESL learners, elementary minority youth, academically failing urban middle school students, and high need STEM learners. The paper will address the value of common and unique performance indicators that drill down from State indicators to local and programmatic outcomes. Fidelity of assessment as well as cross site analysis techniques will be addressed. A summary of cross site results, as well as best practices identified across the projects, also will be presented.
|
|
Face-to-face Training Versus Online Learning: A Comparative Case Study With California Community Organizations
|
| Presenter(s):
|
| Jeanette Treiber, University of California, Davis, jtreiber@ucdavis.edu
|
| Travis Satterlund, University of California, Davis, tdsatter@ucdavis.edu
|
| Abstract:
According to conventional wisdom face-to-face training events are more effective for community organizations than training delivered via e-learning modes such as webinars. Conversely, it also suggests that webinars are less expensive than face-to-face training. However, research gives evidence that both assumptions may need to be re-evaluated. Like many statewide service providers, the Center for Evaluation and Research (CER) at UC Davis is concerned about effective training delivery to the more than 100 local organizations it serves. In May 2011 TCEC will conduct a statewide training on survey design for project directors and evaluators of health departments and community-based organizations. Three face-to-face training events will be compared to an e-learning event with the same content. A pre-and post knowledge test, a training satisfaction survey, key informant interviews with a participant sample as well as a cost comparison will be performed. The paper will make recommendations based on results.
|
| |