2011

Return to search form  

Contact emails are provided for one-to-one contact only and may not be used for mass emailing or group solicitations.

Session Title: Measurement of Interprofessional Education and Health Care Collaboratives
Multipaper Session 383 to be held in Lido C on Thursday, Nov 3, 1:35 PM to 2:20 PM
Sponsored by the Health Evaluation TIG
Chair(s):
Robert LaChausse,  California State University, San Bernardino, rlachaus@csusb.edu
Looking Above the Low-Hanging Fruit: The Importance of Capturing Health Outcomes in Evaluations of Healthcare Collaboratives
Presenter(s):
Ryan Burke, Health Policy Research Northwest, rburke@hprnw.org
Heidi Hascall, Health Policy Research Northwest, hhascall@hprnw.org
Clara Williams, Health Policy Research Northwest, cwilliams@hprnw.org
Erin Owen, Health Policy Research Northwest, eowen@hprnw.org
Abstract: In the midst of a developing national healthcare strategy, communities are forming healthcare collaboratives to meet the needs of their uninsured and underinsured populations. These collaboratives are tailored to their communities and specific populations, making each program unique. However, their goal is generally the same - to improve their clients' health and quality of life. Despite this goal, their program evaluations often focus on low-hanging fruit: process outcomes and outputs that are easily captured (e.g., number of clients served, quantity of services provided). While process outcomes are important for program planning, health outcomes are crucial for measuring the program's impact on the community. Health Policy Research Northwest (HPRN) has worked with healthcare collaboratives in Oregon to conduct comprehensive evaluations that include process and health outcome measures. This presentation will discuss HPRN's methods for measuring health outcomes and elicit ideas from audience members about how these outcomes are captured in other fields.
Inventory of Quantitative Instruments to Measure Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice in Health Care
Presenter(s):
Lynda Weaver, Bruyere Continuing Care, lweaver@bruyere.org
Rebecca Law, Memorial University, rlaw@mun.ca
Jana Lait, Alberta Health Services, jana.lait@albertahealthservices.ca
Robin Roots, Northern Health, roots@island.net
Luljeta Pallaveshi, University of Western Ontario, lpallave@uwo.ca
Patti McCarthy, Memorial University, pattimccarthy@mun.ca
Siegrid Deutschlander, Alberta Health Services, siegrid.deutschlander@albertahealthservices.ca
Esther Suter, Alberta Health Services, esther.suter@albertahealthservices.ca
Nancy Arthur, University of Calgary, narthur@ucalgary.ca
Judy Burgess, University of Victoria, jburgess@uvic.ca
Abstract: Recent emphasis from the Canadian federal and provincial governments on improving interprofessional teamwork in health care settings has driven a surge of changes in health care professionals' education and ways of practice. Evaluation of these endeavours is vital to map their progress and impact. To support such evaluation efforts, a subcommittee of the Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative (CIHC) conducted a comprehensive literature search to compile a state-of-the-art inventory of quantitative evaluation instruments related to interprofessional education and practice. The completed table contains over 120 instruments measuring six modified Kirkpatrick evaluation outcome domains: Attitudes, perceptions; knowledge, skills, abilities; behaviour; organizational practice; patient satisfaction; and provider satisfaction. This inventory, two years in the making, will reside on the CIHC website. In addition to describing the search process and results, this paper will illustrate the subsequent value for educators, administrators, practitioners and evaluators in finding tools that meet their evaluation needs.

 Return to Evaluation 2011

Add to Custom Program