|
Evaluation as a Mechanism for Knowledge Translation
|
| Presenter(s):
|
| Catherine Donnelly, Queen's University, Kingston, donnelyc@queensu.ca
|
| Abstract:
Despite the vast amount of health research there is a large gap between the knowledge produced by researchers and the knowledge used by practitioners. While knowledge translation activities are used to bridge this gap, there is little evidence to suggest these activities result in changes to practice. The evaluation literature has focused on the evaluation of knowledge translation programs with no specific attention on how the process of evaluation itself may serve as a mechanism for knowledge translation. The objective of the paper is to explore how evaluation can facilitate knowledge translation. Methods: A review of the evaluation literature identified concepts and approaches that support the role of evaluation in knowledge translation. Participatory evaluation, evaluation influence and organizational development offered theoretical and empirical evidence to understand the dimensions of evaluation that may facilitate the translation of knowledge. The paper offers a foundation to support further research.
|
|
Valuing of Knowledge in Health and Development: A Knowledge Management/Knowledge Exchange (KM/KE) Conceptual Framework
|
| Presenter(s):
|
| Saori Ohkubo, Johns Hopkins University, sohkubo@jhuccp.org
|
| Tara Sullivan, Johns Hopkins University, tsulliva@jhuccp.org
|
| Abstract:
Knowledge management/knowledge exchange (KM/KE) for health and development practitioners work in a complex environment where knowledge has the potential to improve efficiency, effectiveness and health outcomes. However, theoretical frameworks, indicators and methods have yet to guide this important and multifaceted area. The current effort led by a group of evaluators addresses the challenge of measuring the impacts of KM/KE programs. Building upon the earlier work—a monitoring and evaluation (M&E) guide for health information programs published in 2007, the new edition of the guide offers an updated conceptual framework covering a wide range of KM/KE practices including knowledge sharing and learning at the individual, organizational and programmatic levels. The framework further explores and integrates relevant social and behavior change communication theories. Audience values on knowledge influence the process of knowledge dissemination, sharing and uptake. The value also plays an important role in KM/KE programs and can affect returns on investments.
|
| |