Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2026
I am Santee Ezell, a scholar-practitioner working across evaluation, public health, higher education, and community development in rural Mississippi. My work has taught me that trust is built long before data are collected and that numbers rarely tell the full story.
A survey may show low attendance, missed appointments, or poor retention. Those metrics can look like disengagement, but the fuller story may include transportation barriers, caregiving demands, financial stress, stigma, or difficulty navigating services. That reality shapes how I approach evaluation capacity building in rural Southern communities.
People are more likely to share honest feedback when they believe their voices matter and their experiences will be respected. Data quality often reflects the quality of the relationships behind it. Evaluators must invest time in listening, showing up consistently, and explaining how information will be used.
The phrase “hard to reach” can place blame on students, patients, or community members. Evaluation should instead help us ask whether programs are available at workable times, communicated through trusted channels, and designed around local realities. This shift moves us away from deficit narratives and toward better systems.
Participation counts and completion rates provide useful signals, but they cannot explain why an outcome occurred. Pairing quantitative measures with conversations, open-ended feedback, and frontline staff insights helps organizations understand not only what happened, but what should happen next.
This work also reminds me that capacity does not reside only in an evaluator or a reporting platform. It grows when staff can pause, interpret patterns, test assumptions, and use what they learn. In small rural organizations, that may mean simplifying a form, holding a brief reflection after an event, or inviting community partners to review findings together. These practices make evaluation manageable, relevant, and connected to everyday decisions and long-term improvement efforts.
Strengthening evaluation capacity requires more than templates, dashboards, or reporting compliance. It requires humility, partnership, and systems that value local knowledge alongside formal expertise. When communities help define success, evaluation becomes a tool for learning and stewardship—not merely a funder requirement. From college campuses to community clinics, I have seen evaluation become most powerful when it helps people feel seen, heard, and supported.
The American Evaluation Association is hosting Organizational Learning and Evaluation Capacity Building (OL-ECB) Topical Interest Group Week. The contributions all this week to AEA365 come from our OL-ECB TIG members. Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this AEA365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the AEA365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice. Would you like to submit an AEA365 Tip? Please do so using the form on our website. AEA365 is sponsored by the American Evaluation Association and provides a Tip-a-Day by and for evaluators. The views and opinions expressed on the AEA365 blog are solely those of the original authors and other contributors. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the American Evaluation Association, and/or any/all contributors to this site.